Home About Us CEO Survey Explore Massachusetts Rankings Methodology  

 

City/Town
ZIP
 
Legislature

 

 

 

METHODOLOGY

Community Rankings

MassTrack is based on twelve economic, demographic and community factors that were used to score and rank each of 351 Massachusetts cities and towns. The reports for each city and town provide additional information to more completely describe each community.

The twelve scoring variables, described below, were grouped into three broad categories of importance to Massachusetts technology organizations: taxes, education/workforce and development. Each of these three categories was provided equal weight in calculating the scores for every community. Closely ranked communities are not significantly different based on the scores alone.

Communities were then ranked by score and assigned a value from 1 to 5 stars. Assuming a bell-curve for the score, communities at 3 stars represent the average, while communities at 4 stars are 1 standard deviation above the average score and communities are 5 stars are 2 standard deviations above the average. Similarly, 2 star and 1 star communities are 1 and 2 standard deviations below the average score, respectively.

For technical information about MassTrack variables, methodology and scoring, please contact the Massachusetts High Technology Council at www.mhtc.org.

Tax variables

Split Tax Rate
Whether the community has adopted a split tax rate (in which commercial or industrial property is taxed at a higher rate than residential property) for FY 2008, according to the Massachusetts Department of Revenue. The Department of Revenue has not yet certified the FY08 tax rate for the Town of Richmond, so FY 2007 figures are used for that municipality.

Tax Differential
The ratio of the Fiscal Year 2008 Commercial/Industrial tax rate vs. the Residential tax rate, according to the Massachusetts Department of Revenue. For Richmond, FY 2007 data are used.

Commercial Tax Rate
The FY2008 Commercial/Industrial tax rate per $1000 of assessed value, according to the Massachusetts Department of Revenue. For Richmond, FY 2007 data are used.

Have Tax Increment Financing
Whether the community has been established as an Economic Target Area for purposes of designating one or more Tax Increment Financing zones that provide incentives for business investment.

Education and Workforce

MCAS Proficient/Advanced
The percentage of each city or town's 10th grade public high school students that scored "advanced" or "proficient" on the 2008 MCAS (Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System) mathematics test. Regional Technical/Vocation/Agricultural schools were excluded from this calculation. Other Regional School Districts were included, and the percentages for these schools were applied to the communities that belong to regional districts.

MCAS Trend
The change in the percentage of each city or town's 10th grade public high school students that scored "advanced" or "proficient" from 2007 to 2008 in the MCAS (Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System) mathematics test.

30 Minute College Graduate
The number of college educated adults in the population, as defined by the 2000 U.S. Census at the Block Group level, who are within a 30 minute drive time from the center point of each community under normal traffic conditions.

Technology Workforce
The percentage of employees with each community's daytime workforce that is employed in "technology innovation" sectors, as defined by the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative. The technology innovation sectors were defined by NAICS (North American Industry Classification System); corresponding SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) codes were then matched to ZIPs and Cities/Towns within Massachusetts to calculate the workforce percentage within the technology sector. Post secondary education employees were not calculated in this percentage. The source for this data is Dun & Bradstreet, July-September 2008.

Development

MEPA Projects 2004-2007
The net number of Massachusetts Environmental Protection Agency permits that were issued to each community for the period 2004-2007.

New Growth Trend
The average annual percent change in the value of commercial and industrial property from FY 2005 to FY 2008, according to the Massachusetts Department of Revenue.

Fast Track Permitting
Whether a community has accepted Chapter 43D, the Expedited Permitting Program, as of October 15, 2008. This program is administered by the Massachusetts Office of Housing and Economic Development.

Housing Starts Per Capita
The number of housing starts for Calendar 2007, as reported by the U.S. Census, per 1000 households in the community according to the 2000 U.S. Census.

Descriptive Variables (Not Used for Rankings)

2000 Population
The 2000 population for each community, according to the U.S. Census.

2000 Households
The number of households in each community, according to the 2000 U.S. Census.

30 Minute Labor Force
The number of adults in the labor force, as defined by the 2000 U.S. Census at the Block Group level, who are within a 30 minute drive time from the center point of each community under normal traffic conditions.

College Graduate
The percentage of each city or town's population age 25 or older that has a four-year college degree, according to the 2000 U.S. Census.

2000 Average Commute Time
The average commuting time, in minutes, according to the 2000 U.S. Census.

Median Household Income
The median household income for each community, according to the 2000 U.S. Census.

Median Home Value
The median home value in each community, according to the 2000 U.S. Census.

Residential Tax Rate
The FY2008 Residential Tax Rate per $1000 of residential valuation, according to the Massachusetts Department of Revenue.

Mileage to Acute Care Hospital and Hospital Name
The distance in miles from the center point of each community to the closest Acute Care Hospital in the Massachusetts Hospital Association database.

Community Web Site
The URL for each community's official web site, where available.

LEGISLATIVE SCORING

The MassTrack Legislative scorecard is based on seven weighted factors applied to individual votes on seven legislative bills from the 2007-2008 session of the Massachusetts State Senate and House of Representatives. The weights are based on the response to questions in the Mass High Technology Council's 2008 member survey, and are applied to legislation that directly relates to the priorities of MHTC member companies regarding taxes, investment, education, health care policy and economic stimulus.

The MassTrack legislative rankings will be updated in the fall of a biannual election year.

The votes and weights are as follows:

Bill Weight MHTC Position Summary Date Title
HB4829 4.90 Y Life Sciences Initiative H: 6/11/08
S: 6/16/08
Relative to providing for the investment in and expansion of the life sciences industry in the Commonwealth
HB4488 5.93 N Restructuring Education Bureaucracy H: 2/6/08
S: 2/7/08
A message from His Excellency the Governor submitting Reorganization plan number 1 of 2008, relative to reorganizing certain education agencies
HB4904 5.88 N Employer tax increase 7/1/08 Relative to tax fairness and business competitiveness
HB5022 5.88 N Increased Health Care Assessments H: 7/31/08
S: 7/30/08
Relative to making appropriations for the fiscal year 2008 to provide for supplementing certain existing appropriations and for certain other activities and projects
SB1059* 5.00 Y Treble Damages for Wage Violations Act H: 2/28/08
S: 2/26/08
Relative to clarifying the law protecting employee compensation
SB2768 5.21 Y Green Communities Act H: 6/26/08
S: 6/25/08
Relative to green communities
HB4528** 5.86 Y Unemployment Insurance Rate Freeze 2/19/08 Relative to unemployment insurance rates

*Vote on Treble Damages bill was on enactment of Governor's amendment.

**SB4528 was approved by both branches without a roll call vote. MHTC offered legislators the opportunity to indicate that they would have supported the Council's position has a roll call been taken. Legislators who responded in the affirmative were given bonus points to their scores. Those who did not respond did not have their scores affected.

For each legislator, the vote is assigned a value proportionate to its weight; the sum of all weighted scores is scaled from 0 to 100, so that a legislator with a score of 100 voted in accordance with the MHTC position on all bills. Missed votes are given 50% of the weight for that vote. For legislators who missed one or more votes due to the date of their election, of because of military service, the weighted scores are based on the votes they did take.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
©2008 MassTrack, MHTC. All Rights Reserved.